Saturday, May 29, 2010

Legal News Summary

Summary

Teenagers bailed on rape charges

ADRIAN LOWE

Four Melbourne youths have been granted bail after being charged with almost 70 counts of rape.

The charges relate to the alleged gang rape of a 15-year-old girl at a St Albans public toilet block earlier this month.

A detective told the court last week that the girl was forced into a cubicle. The first youth left the toilet after allegedly raping the girl three times, the court heard.

The youths were bailed to reappear at the same court in August.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Legal News- The Age

Teenagers bailed on rape charges

ADRIAN LOWE

May 25, 2010 - 2:27PM

Four Melbourne youths have been granted bail after being charged with almost 70 counts of rape.

The charges relate to the alleged gang rape of a 15-year-old girl at a St Albans public toilet block earlier this month.

The four were bailed from a Melbourne Childrens Court today after a magistrate ruled they were not an unacceptable risk of reoffending, failing to answer bail or endangering the safety or welfare of the public.

The Age revealed last week that the four youths, two aged 15 and two 16, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, each face 17 charges of rape and one of false imprisonment over the alleged attack on May 5.

Police allege three of the four youths followed the girl from a railway station through the streets of Sunshine and St Albans before snatching her dropped school bag and forcing her into the toilet block at the back of the St John’s Church in St Albans.

A detective told the court last week that the girl was forced into a cubicle. One boy told her to remove her clothing and raped her, he said.

The detective said the three co-accused kept watch.

The first youth left the toilet after allegedly raping the girl three times, the court heard.

After he left, the three co-accused entered one at a time and raped the girl at least twice each, the detective said.

After the fourth youth left the toilet, the first re-entered the cubicle and the initial order of the four entering and raping was repeated, the court was told last week.

Between each of the teenagers allegedly raping her, the girl repeatedly asked to have her bag returned and that she be able to go home, but they refused.

The magistrate said the prosecution case was a strong one. The youths were bailed to reappear at the same court in August.

Legal News

Fitchett guilty of killing two sons

Note:

· Fitchett 51 years old, Melbourne home in September 2005.

· She was convicted of murdering her two sons

· Had pleaded not guilty to murdering Thomas, 11, and Matthew, 9

· By drugging and then strangling or suffocating them before trying to kill herself

· She admitted the killings but pleaded not guilty

· Murder on the grounds of mental impairment.

· The prosecution argued that Fitchett acted consciously, voluntarily and deliberately when she killed her sons to get back at her husband for a less-than-satisfactory marriage.

· The jury rejected claims by Fitchett’s defence lawyer, Patrick Tehan, QC, that his client was not guilty on the grounds of mental impairment.

· Fitchett was sentenced in 2008 to 24 years, with a minimum of 18 years, in a secure psychiatric facility.

Summary :

Mum who was serving a sentence for a crime of murdering her two sons Thomas, 11, and Matthew, 9 before she was granted a retrial has once again been found guilty in the Victorian Supreme Court.

She confessed the killings by drugging and then strangling or suffocating them before trying to kill herself but she pleaded not guilty to murder on the grounds of mental impairment.

To bring a legal action against Fitchett who was acted consciously, voluntarily and deliberately when she killed her sons to get back at her husband for a unsuccessful marriage.

Prosecutor Gavin Silbert, SC, told the jury that four days before the killings, Fitchett told her husband she was going to leave him and take the boys, but later decided she could not go on as a single parent.

Fitchett was sentenced in 2008 to 24 years, with a minimum of 18 years, in a secure psychiatric facility.

Personal Reflection:

While l was reading this depressing news, still l can’t believe how is a

mother might be so brutal and crucial toward her kids. It is also

surprising me that Fitchett had mental history and how Government

authorized that she has that capability to raise her kids. The Murder of 2

kids might be alarming point for Health department that should really

concentrate on mental family issues that increasing recently.

Monday, May 24, 2010

Legal News

Fitchett guilty of killing two sons

ANDREA PETRIE

May 18, 2010 - 4:41PM

A court sketch of Donna Fitchett. Photo: Fay Plamka

A Melbourne mother who was convicted of murdering her two sons before she was granted a retrial has once again been found guilty in the Victorian Supreme Court.

Fitchett, 51, had pleaded not guilty to murdering Thomas, 11, and Matthew, nine, by drugging and then strangling or suffocating them before trying to kill herself at their Melbourne home in September 2005.

She admitted the killings but pleaded not guilty to murder on the grounds of mental impairment.

The jury took about four hours to deliver a second guilty verdict.

Fitchett, who was leaning against a prison guard, remained impassive with her head bowed as the verdict was delivered.

A woman sitting near Fitchett’s former husband David let out a cry of joy.

Later, Fitchett quietly whispered her name and date of birth when asked by the judge’s associate.

Outside court, Mr Fitchett said that two juries had now made the right decision.

"Another 12 people saw through the absolutely shallow, shallow pathetic defence," he said.

"I know that she knew exactly what she was doing was wrong, absolutely no doubt about it.

"She is a manipulative, cunning, street-smart woman and she knew all along what she was doing was wrong."

During her retrial, the jury heard that the qualified nurse told her sons she was taking them on a trip and they needed medicine so they would not be sick, before giving them sedatives and telling them to go and lie down until they felt better.

She then suffocated and strangled the boys before she unsuccessfully tried to take her own life.

The prosecution argued that Fitchett acted consciously, voluntarily and deliberately when she killed her sons to get back at her husband for a less-than-satisfactory marriage.

Prosecutor Gavin Silbert, SC, told the jury that four days before the killings, Fitchett told her husband she was going to leave him and take the boys, but later decided she could not go on as a single parent.

She had apparently planned to commit suicide after killing the boys, telling her husband in a note found at the scene: "I just couldn’t abandon our beautiful boys".

In a letter she sent to her psychologist Patra Antonis before she murdered them — whom she called "a liar" from the dock as Ms Antonis gave evidence at the retrial — Fitchett described killing them as "my greatest act of love".

Mr Silbert told the jury the letter was "coherent, reasoned, logically and sensible".

"It canvasses a plan and a course of conduct which I submit to you bespeaks a lucid and organised mind," he told the jury.

"It evinces a clear knowledge that what she was about to do, i.e, murder the two boys was wrong."

The jury heard that Fitchett told close friend Kathlyn Schipper after the boys’ deaths that she stopped strangling Matthew to put the family dog Jemma outside, who was trying to protect him from being murdered. She then returned to kill him.

Fitchett told Ms Schipper: "If I’d known that she was going to be like that I would have put her out in the first place," the court heard.

The jury rejected claims by Fitchett’s defence lawyer, Patrick Tehan, QC, that his client was not guilty on the grounds of mental impairment.

"The act of killing those two boys who she so dearly loved as being for her an act of love epitomises her lack of capacity to think rationally that it was wrong," Mr Tehan said.

He claimed his client was severely depressed and her mind was "disordered or disturbed" when she killed them.

Fitchett was sentenced in 2008 to 24 years, with a minimum of 18 years, in a secure psychiatric facility.

But her sentence was overturned by the Court of Appeal last year due to a technical oversight by the trial judge, who failed to adequately inform the jury of the legal consequences of a finding of not guilty by reason of mental impairment, as required by the Crimes Act.

The act required judges to explain the various options available to them in the event of such a finding, which included imposing a supervision order or releasing the accused without condition, the Court of Appeal deemed.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/fitchett-guilty-of-killing-two-sons-20100518-vbql.html